Adventures In Audio
When is it right for an artist to re-invent themself?

David Mellor

David Mellor is CEO and Course Director of Audio Masterclass. David has designed courses in audio education and training since 1986 and is the publisher and principal writer of Adventures In Audio.

Monday August 21, 2006
FREE EBOOK DOWNLOAD ►

Question from a Audio Masterclass reader...

Hi David,

A friend and I were debating about this a little while ago. We both decided to debate about how artists may re-invent themselves from time to time and have great success, as others can't pull it off well, and others may not do it at all but still be successful.

Madonna changes her sound a lot and still remains to have good mainstream success these days. You don't usually hear comments like, "Madonna is totally a thing of the 80s. Even her modern material reeks of the 80s." Sure, she may still sound a bit 80s-ish from time to time, but she's definitely not stuck in that era.

U2 has developed a little bit over the years, but still sound very much like how they always have and still seem to have some good success to this day.

My friend mentioned that Korn tried to re-invent themselves a few times but people didn't like their transformations.

What do you think are some effective ways for an artist to re-invent themselves?

Thanks,

Marc

Audio Masterclass's David Mellor responds...

I don't propose to attempt a definitive answer, particularly on the nature of how re-invention should take place, but I do have some thoughts on this subject...

Firstly, you have to bear in mind that the career of the average artist or band is short, maybe just three or four years. Why is this?

There are three main reasons why the average life span of an artist or band is short. The first is if they are not profitable. Many artists and bands may seem to be successful, but this is only because their record label presents them so. In fact, revenue from their recordings may be less than their marketing costs, so they are not profitable, hence they disappear.

Another reason is that an act's first record might sell well, the second much less so. So the record label extrapolates this downward trajectory and sees that the third album just isn't worth making.

The third reason is that the recording industry's stock-in-trade is ephemera. Somehow, the market expects most acts to be here today and gone tomorrow, with new and temporarily exciting acts to replace them.

So it is important to realize that a short career is the norm. If you want to have a long career, then you are going to have to do something positive to achieve this. Periodic re-invention may be one possibility.

But what about the acts that don't reinvent. Yes, U2 is an excellent example. REM is another. The answer here is that both of these acts, and other non-re-inventing acts, achieved iconic status very quickly. U2 for example established themselves as the premier act of the British new wave of the 1980s. Other acts might have done that, but they either fell apart or didn't have quality in depth. (Yes, I know that U2 are Irish! It was the British new wave that was British.)

If you can achieve iconic status as the figurehead of a musical or social revolution, then you do indeed have a career for life. You don't have to change much, or perhaps even not at all (Rolling Stones).

Now, what about the re-inventors? Madonna and David Bowie spring to mind. Neither of these acts was top of their league when they first appeared. Among the front-runners perhaps, but with stiff competition. So longevity through iconic status was never an option.

David Bowie in particular simply had to re-invent. The early 1970s was a period that had to come to an end, and there was absolutely no possibility that Ziggy Stardust nor Aladdin Sane would have survived through to the 1980s.

So Bowie re-invented. But not at the end of Ziggy/Aladdin's natural life span. He changed early, and disappointed many of his fans. But he did the right thing at the right time with his Thin White Duke character.

Ultimately, Bowie was so successful for such a long period that his career in music at a very high level is assured, even though he perhaps doesn't now command as much attention as he once did. A re-invention too few perhaps?

Madonna is still going strong. Her re-inventions tend to be more frequent and more subtle. She extends beyond the musical into lifestyle too, such as her involvement in the Kabala religion. Musically, she is bold in her choice of producers and always stays close to the cutting edge of pop.

So, the advice...

If you can, achieve iconic status as the leading act in a musical or social revolution. (You wish!)

Otherwise, achieve popularity, but recognize that things are going to change and your style will become old-fashioned. Re-invent yourself early and become a leading light in the next new style.

Remember that re-invention involves risks. Your first album after re-invention may bomb and your career is dead. But it was dying anyway. By re-inventing you have given yourself at least a chance of an extended career where otherwise you would have been cast by the wayside.

Conclusion - re-invention is good! But the question I didn't answer was how?

Like, follow, and comment on this article at Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, Instagram or the social network of your choice.

Come on the Audio Masterclass Pro Home Studio MiniCourse - 60 great hints and tips to get your home recording studio MOVING

It's FREE!

Get It Now >>

How to choose the best key for your song

What is comb filtering? What does it sound like?

NEW: Audio crossfades come to Final Cut Pro X 10.4.9!

What is the difference between EQ and filters? *With Audio*

What difference will a preamp make to your recording?

Watch our video on linear phase filters and frequency response with the FabFilter Pro Q 2

Read our post on linear phase filters and frequency response with the Fabfilter Pro Q 2

Harmonic distortion with the Soundtoys Decapitator

What's the best height for studio monitors? Answer - Not too low!

What is the Red Book standard? Do I need to use it? Why?

Will floating point change the way we record?

Mixing: What is the 'Pedalboard Exception'?

The difference between mic level and line level

The problem with parallel compression that you didn't know you had. What it sounds like and how to fix it.

Compressing a snare drum to even out the level

What does parallel compression on vocals sound like?

How to automate tracks that have parallel compression

Why mono is better than stereo for recording vocals and dialogue

Clipping and compressing a drum recording to achieve an exciting sound texture

What can we learn about room acoustics from this image?

Can you hear the subtle effect of the knee control of the compressor? (With audio and video demonstrations)

What is the best studio microphone?

What is the Neve sound? (Using the Slate Digital FG-73)

What is the difference between recording, mixing and mastering?