Adventures In Audio
Do vintage musical styles benefit from modern mastering techniques?

David Mellor

David Mellor is CEO and Course Director of Audio Masterclass. David has designed courses in audio education and training since 1986 and is the publisher and principal writer of Adventures In Audio.

Thursday June 7, 2012

Here's an interesting piece of music...

For me, this music has the flavor of the band 'Yes' from the early 1970s. It's probably the bass guitar that does it. I like the enthusiasm of the playing a lot. I don't want to go back to the early 1970s, but it's an interesting musical period, and the sounds are completely different to what we commonly hear today.


Along with the 1970s music, clearly we have an additional layer of 21st century mastering techniques. In terms of trying to make the track loud enough to compete with anything else that's around today, the mastering is certainly doing its job.


Modern mastering techniques do have a tendency to turn everything into a kind of 'wall of sound', to borrow a phrase from Phil Spektor (and that's going even further back in time).

This is fine if you want your track to have plenty of impact. Indeed, many modern recordings consist of a vocal backed by a wall of sound of indeterminate instrumentation.
It doesn't matter whether I like it or not, or even whether you like it or not. It's what the market likes that determines what we will mostly get to hear in the mass media. And the market does seem to like the heavily mastered sound right now.

However, I don't think it works well in this instance. Clearly there is some excellent musicianship in this track and, from what I can tell, it seems to be reasonably well recorded.

But the mastering has turned everything into a bit of a mush, where I would prefer to be able to hear the individual instruments blending together, and with each instrument clearly audible in itself. In that way, the musicianship would be more to the forefront.
This is a good opportunity for comment, to get a feeling for what the recording community thinks. So have your say below. What do you think about the sound? Good or bad? Whatever your opinion, please tell us why.

Come on the Audio Masterclass Pro Home Studio MiniCourse - 60 great hints and tips to get your home recording studio MOVING

It's FREE!

Get It Now >>

How to choose the best key for your song

What is comb filtering? What does it sound like?

NEW: Audio crossfades come to Final Cut Pro X 10.4.9!

What is the difference between EQ and filters? *With Audio*

What difference will a preamp make to your recording?

Watch our video on linear phase filters and frequency response with the FabFilter Pro Q 2

Read our post on linear phase filters and frequency response with the Fabfilter Pro Q 2

Harmonic distortion with the Soundtoys Decapitator

What's the best height for studio monitors? Answer - Not too low!

What is the Red Book standard? Do I need to use it? Why?

Will floating point change the way we record?

Mixing: What is the 'Pedalboard Exception'?

The difference between mic level and line level

The problem with parallel compression that you didn't know you had. What it sounds like and how to fix it.

Compressing a snare drum to even out the level

What does parallel compression on vocals sound like?

How to automate tracks that have parallel compression

Why mono is better than stereo for recording vocals and dialogue

Clipping and compressing a drum recording to achieve an exciting sound texture

What can we learn about room acoustics from this image?

Can you hear the subtle effect of the knee control of the compressor? (With audio and video demonstrations)

What is the best studio microphone?

What is the Neve sound? (Using the Slate Digital FG-73)

What is the difference between recording, mixing and mastering?